Filibusters: Great for the New Iraq, But Not Here

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Filibusters: Great for the New Iraq, But Not Here

In today's Washington Post, Al Kamen writes:
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) has been talking about "going nuclear" and outlawing the Democrats' use of the filibuster to block President Bush's judicial nominees. So yesterday we find freshman Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) offering this on the floor in favor of more funds for Iraq:

Isakson, noting he had just been in Iraq, said he asked a Kurdish leader if he worried that the majority Shiites would "overrun" the minority Kurds. And "he says, 'Oh, no, we have a secret weapon.' . . . And when asked what it was, he said one word, 'filibuster,' and then proceeded to describe their study of American democracy and our republic."

"If there were ever a reason for optimism about" giving more aid to Iraq, Isakson said, "it is one of their minority leaders proudly stating one of the pillars and principles of our government as the way they would ensure that the majority never overran the minority." The Democrats gleefully distributed his remarks.
Did you hear that, Senator Frist? One of your GOP Senate colleagues believes the filibuster is "one of the pillars" of our democracy.

0 comments in Filibusters: Great for the New Iraq, But Not Here

Post a Comment

 
Filibusters: Great for the New Iraq, But Not Here | Demagogue Copyright © 2010