|
|
|
Demagoguery |
|
|
|
"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth."
Franklin D. Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Candidates - Give 'Em $25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, October 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
Chiyotaikai
My daughters' favorite rikishi ("sumo wrestler" to the vulgar), the ozeki-ranked Chiyotaikai:
.
Having gone 11-4 in the July and September tournaments, Chiyo has a shot at promotion to the exalted rank of yokozuna if he can win the November tournament--and, as you all know, the November tournament is held in Kyushu, Chiyo's home turf.
Ganbare, Chiyotaikai!
posted by
Arnold P. California at 7:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workfare, Japanese Style
Having lived in Japan for about one and a half years, and having a brother-in-law and his family in Tokyo, I try to keep up with the news from there as best I can. (I believe my daughters may be the youngest white sumo fans in North America; but I digress).
I offer for your consideration a Japan Times article entitled "Single Moms Find Favor With Ministry":The health ministry plans to give preferential treatment to single mothers when hiring part-time workers, officials said Thursday. The move is part of its program to support fatherless families under special legislation enacted in July.
When choosing from applications for part-time clerical work, the Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry will favor single mothers if there are no significant differences in qualifications from their competitors, the officials said.
***
The measure is aimed at supporting fatherless families, which are under an additional financial strain due to the continuing economic slump.
***
Many single mothers have part-time jobs, and their average annual income in 1998 was only about 2.3 million yen -- roughly one-third that of an ordinary household. They often face job cuts and tough prospects for re-employment as companies try to trim their payrolls, according to the ministry.
***
In the current fiscal year, the ministry has launched a program to pay 300,000 yen to employers each time they give full-time status to single mothers who were originally hired as part-time workers. ***
Calls to provide employment support for single mothers have been mounting since the government slashed child-rearing allowances for low-income households in April. The government claimed the cuts were aimed at focusing on measures to help single mothers be more self-reliant and find employment. I'm not sure what I think of all this, but my intuition is that it's an improvement on making welfare recipients do make-work jobs. Of course, there will almost surely not be enough legitimate jobs in the Ministry to provide for all the single moms who need work, but to the extent the government needs part-time workers, why not give a chance to a vulnerable population that has relatively few other opportunities to find work?
posted by
Arnold P. California at 6:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judge Moore, meet Rev. Phelps
Fred Phelps--pastor of the anti-gay Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas and custodian of the GodHatesFags web site--has vowed to put up "monuments" commemorating the brutal murder of Matthew Shepard throughout the country. The Caspar Star Tribune reports:
The monument, which proclaims that Shepard, who was gay, is in hell, will be placed in cities that have Ten Commandments monuments on display in publicly owned facilities. [Emphasis mine.]
"We are going to pock-mark this nation from sea to shining sea with this message on the monument: ... 'Matthew Shepard entered hell October the 12th, 1998, at age 21 in defiance of God's warning, 'Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind; it is abomination' -- Leviticus 18:22,'" Phelps said in a telephone interview. "That is the message this nation needs, whether it knows it or not or whether it wants it or not. And that's the message we are determined the nation is going to receive." Everyone knows that Phelps is a crackpot and even virulently anti-gay right-wing groups keep him at arms length. This distance will be difficult to maintain now that Phelps is following the same First Amendment logic that conservatives use to justify his actions. Essentially, Phelps is saying that if a locality sees fit to put a religious monument to the Ten Commandments in the public square, it has no right to forbid his "religious" monument.
So how does this effect Ten Commandments Judge Roy Moore, who has always argued that the Constitution was intended to protect religion from the government, not government from religion? When Moore's Ten Commandments monument was ordered removed from the Alabama state supreme courthouse last August, his supporters were quick to cite public opinion polls showing that three quarters of Americans opposed the move. To be sure, considerably fewer Americans would sign on to Phelps' anti-gay philosophy. Perhaps if people see enough Commandment-Shepard monument combos out there, they'll want to plug the holes Moore is drilling into the wall between church and state.
posted by
Noam Alaska at 5:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endorsed With Faint Praise
Calpundit informs us that Michael Totten predicts an electoral disaster for the Democrats Democratic Senator Zell Miller has endorsed George W. Bush for president.
Life-long left-liberal Roger L. Simon has endorsed George W. Bush for president.
Life-long left-liberal Cara Remal has endorsed George W. Bush for president.
All in the last three days.
[edit]
Democrats: You had better snap out of denial and get your act together fast. You are in so much trouble and you have no idea.
Let's see just what sort of rousing endorsement Simon and Remal are offering.
Simon says [I'm a liberal, blah, blah, blah]
Still, if the election were held today, like Georgia Democratic Senator Zell Miller, I would vote for George W. Bush without a second’s hesitation. That’s how bad I think the Democrats are on foreign policy, by far the most important issue of our day. I will go further. They are one of the sleaziest collections of low-down opportunists I have ever seen on one stage together short of that crowd of tobacco executives who testified “No, sirree, I didn’t know that nicotine was addictive.” These dudes and one dudette (Mosely-Braun) are downright dangerous. (Okay, Lieberman can be sane, but he doesn’t seem to have a chance in that bizarre atmosphere). And here’s why I think they’re dangerous—they’re acting like we’re still in Vietnam when we’re in a real war of civilizations. We’re on the right side this time. Haven't they seen the videotapes of Baathists chopping their own countrymens' heads off and pushing them off roofs? Haven't they seen the unmarked graves of children? What’s going on with these people? Do they think suicide bombers driving into the Red Cross are pacifist Buddhist monks?
And Remal says I would go one step further and ask the Democratic Presidential candidates to dare to say with a straight face and a clear conscience that the Iraqi people would be better off now if we had left Saddam Hussein in power, because they are coming way too close (for and to Comfort) to saying that these days. Clark literally said that “this war was unnecessary”.
I have to say that I agree with Roger Simon and the Democratic Senator Zell Miller on this one. Unless the delusions of the far “left” stop infecting these candidates, unless they stop hallucinating that Iraq is Vietnam, unless they get off the opportunists bus they’re riding on, unless they see that the (party) problems of nine little candidates don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world, and if the election were held today, even though I disagree with Bush domestically, I would have to vote for George W. Bush. No contest.
There are a lot of "ifs" in those "endorsements." In fact, they aren't really endorsements at all. It is like saying "if I find another cockroach in my McDonald's Happy Meal, I am going to start eating at Burger King." That is not an endorsement of Burger King; it is a warning to McDonald's.
But even if Simon and Remal are just warning the Democratic candidates, such warnings should be ignored, as they are based entirely on deliberate misconceptions about why this war was launched.
Nobody, anywhere, ever has claimed that Iraqis would have been better of with Hussein still in power. If you want to pretend that that is what people mean when they criticize the war or say that it was unnecessary, then there is not a lot I can do about it. But I can try to explain to you that, in terms of national security - which is the grounds upon which this war was justified - it was unnecessary.
I don't know why I have to keep saying this, but this war was not launched on humanitarian grounds. It very well could have been, but it wasn't. It was launched because Hussein supposedly possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction and had ties to terrorists, and some day those terrorists were going to get those weapons and use them to attack America.
That, as it turns out, probably wasn't true. As such, the war was unnecessary.
But the war was not launched to save Iraqi citizens. How do I know? Because I have my own version of Potter Stewart's "obscenity - I know it when I see it" argument: if it had been, I would have supported it.
So, in the end, if you are going to cast your vote for Bush solely because you perceive the Democrats to be a bunch of Hussein-loving lunatics, I can't say that I am particularly sorry to see you go.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 4:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Born Again in Michigan
Abortion is an issue that generates more than its share of spin. A recent example was the passing of the "partial birth" abortion ban--which I put in quotes because there is, in fact no medical procedure called "partial birth" abortion. The term is a misleading marketing ploy used by groups that oppose late-term abortions under all circumstances.
Of course, all sides of the abortion debate engage in such spin to some extent: the terms "pro-choice" and "pro-life" are really marketing slogans that generate more heat than light. The real question is when (or, some would argue, whether) women have the right to an abortion.
The latest attempt at anti-abortion marketing--and the most absurd in recent memory--comes courtesy of the Michigan state legislature. Here's how the right-wing Center for Reclaiming America (CRA)describes it:
The Legal Birth Definition Act was devised to ban specific abortion procedures by re-defining when the moment of birth occurred. Under this legislation, a child would be constitutionally protected under the Constitution once the baby demonstrated a detectable heartbeat, evidence of breathing, spontaneous movement, or umbilical cord pulsation. As any junior high student who attends health class can tell you, human birth generally occurs 9 months after the egg is fertilized. But now, Michigan legislators would have us believe that people are "born" (there are those snarky quotation marks again--even CRA uses them in this instance) not when the umbilical cord is cut, but as early as 7 weeks into a pregnancy, when a heartbeat can first be detected by ultrasound. By this reasoning, George Washington's birthday should be celebrated not on February 22nd, but sometime in July.
Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm sensibly vetoed this legislation, although there is still a possibility an override by the legislature.
If Michigan legislators really believe that an embryo is a human life at 7 weeks, or even at conception, they should just say so. I'd disagree with them, but at least it would be an honest disagreement. Instead, they've chosen the path of legislative sophistry.
posted by
Noam Alaska at 12:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Dishonesty
As a totally un-related follow-up to Arnold's post yesterday about the Claude Allen hearing and "ritualistic lying," Michael Kinsely weighs in on the subject as it relates to stem-cell research The distinguishing feature of modern Washington dishonesty is that it is almost transparent, barely intended to deceive. It uses true-ish factoids to construct an implied assertion about reality that is not just false but preposterous. Modern Washington dishonesty is more like an elaborate, stylized ritual than a realistic Western-style performance. The goal is not to persuade but merely to create an impression that there are two sides to the question without actually having to supply one of them.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 12:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Force
The army is going to launch an investigation. Or rather, an investigation of the original investigation Facing criticism for dropping an investigation of an elite U.S. platoon that slaughtered Vietnamese villagers, Army officials have reopened the case to find out why no one was charged despite evidence that the unit violently lost control in 1967.
[edit]
The Army’s review could help determine why key suspects were allowed to resign during the investigation - escaping the reach of military prosecutors, and why three murder suspects were never charged when the inquiry was completed.
Frederick wrote about the atrocities committed by Tiger Force here.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 11:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lunatics on Parade
Hey, I took issue with Jonah Goldberg's latest column, but at least I didn't become completely psychotic about it.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 10:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A World of Delusion
After Texas Democrats met with the Justice Department to air their complaints about the state's new congressional map, the Dallas Morning News reports that Some Republicans denounced the Democrats' efforts. "It would be inappropriate for Texas Democrats to seek to strong-arm, intimidate or even lobby the Justice Department to protect their seats," said Jonathan Grella, spokesman for House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, the Sugar Land Republican who urged GOP legislators to redraw the lines imposed two years ago by judges.
I have said it before and I'll say it again, and I will continue to say it whenever his name shows up on this blog: Tom DeLay is the "World's Biggest Asshole."
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 10:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move Over Bill O'Reilly
Here comes someone yuckier-- CNBC has hired Dennis Miller for his own talk show.
Miller is wayyyy yuckier than Bill O'Reilly because he actually used to be funny and exhibit signs that he was intelligent. Now he's just another arrogant conservative blowhard a**hole.
So how many right-wing talk show hosts does that make? O'Reilly, Matthews, Scarborough, Hannity, Carlson...
How many liberals? Um, well, there was Donahue. There's a few liberals on Crosstalk, ahem, I mean Crossfire. A few liberals on the McGlaughlin Group. Out of the Sunday morning talk shows there's Stephanopoulos, but he's pretty milquetoast. There's Bill Maher, but he's on HBO weekly at 11 on Fridays for pete's sake.
Then again, we do have Jon Stewart, who is smarter and funnier than all of them combined. But his show is satire and not political commentary per se. Where are all the prime time firebrand liberals?
posted by
Zoe Kentucky at 9:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who Said This?
On the Senate floor yesterday “Judge Charles Pickering has been victimized by inaccurate race-baiting, and political trash talk by the news media, members of Congress and Washington's liberal elite.
[edit]
“But the special interest groups don’t care about any of that. They don’t want to hear how qualified Justice Brown and Judge Pickering are or how much the voters like the jobs they have done.
“No, their only mission is to assassinate these good people’s character and to take them down one way or another because they fear they won’t cater to their liberal agenda.
“Folks such as Judge Charles Pickering and Justice Janice Rogers Brown deserve fair treatment, not ruthless, cruel, character assassination.”
If you guessed it was some right-wing Republican, you were right.
It was Zell Miller. (via Southern Appeal)
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 9:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday, October 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
The Anti-Gay World of NR's John Derbyshire
National Review Online offers yet another homophobic column by John Derbyshire. In the column (posted Thursday, Oct. 30), Derbyshire complains that a college professor from the Midwest made far too much of a fuss over Derbyshire's June 25 column. Well, let's consider what might have offended that professor.
In the June 25 column, Derbyshire wrote:"Please don't send me e-mails arguing that pederasty has nothing whatever to do with homosexuality. I don't believe it." Perhaps Derbyshire doesn't want to believe it. The consensus from researchers who (unlike Derbyshire) have examined the issue from a clinical or scientific perspective is that there is no link between being a pedophile and being gay -- a view held, for example, by Dr. Fred Berlin, who operates one of the largest pedophile treatment programs in the nation at Johns Hopkins University. But wait. Derbyshire has more to add. While being gay, he acknowledges, may well be genetic, there are still ample reasons, he tells us, to permit discrimination against gays:"The point is that open homosexuality is -- not necessarily, but all too often -- an infiltrating, exclusivist, corruptive, and destructive force." Tell us how you really feel, John ... no need to sugar-coat it. Now, fast-forward to Derbyshire's most recent column in which he explains that:"a sufficient concentration of open homosexuals in the higher levels of an organization ... changes the character of that organization, to the degree that heterosexuals feel unwelcome in it." Of course, what makes someone like Derbyshire feel "unwelcome" says more about his attitudes toward gays than their attitudes toward him. It's safe to assume that the vast majority of social or religious organizations are dominated by heterosexuals. Does their prevalence, in and of itself, make gay people feel "unwelcome"? Does this other side of the coin bother Derbyshire at all? Apparently not.
None of this homophobic rhetoric is new for Derbyshire. In a 2001 column, he wrote:"What I want to talk about here is the fact of my disliking homosexuality. ... I am not cruel, or bigoted, or intolerant. Nor am I aware of anyone who knows me that believes be to be any of those things. Like Thomas More: 'I wish none harm, I say none harm, I do none harm.' " Unbelieveable. Derbyshire claims the mantle of "say none harm" only a few paragraphs after he calls homosexuality "freakish and slightly disgusting." John, how foolish do you think your readers are?
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 6:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corner Exposes Liberal Media Bias
An excellent example of an error to which both left and right are susceptible: mistaking the natural imperatives of newgathering for partisan bias.Just seconds before the Capital gun scare story died, CNN's Jonathan Karl was beginning his interview with New York Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy. Why select her from the 435 members of Congress? Why, because her husband was the victim of gun violence, of course!
Fortunately, the story turned out to be a false alarm. Otherwise CNN's viewers would have been subjected to who knows how much fear-inspired, uninformed anti-gun speculation.
This example of liberal media bias is so great, one suspects even Eric Alterman might notice. If you were a reporter, and Congressional business had been brought to a halt because some nut had apparently entered the building with a gun, wouldn't you want to interview a member of Congress whose life had been altered by gun violence and who had made gun control her signature issue? Wouldn't an interview with her be more interesting to your viewers than an interview with virtually any other Representative?
This is somewhat reminiscent of the complaint that the media covers people getting blown up in Iraq instead of covering school openings. You don't need to hate George Bush to do that; you just need to like having at least a handful of people watch your show or read your newspaper.
posted by
Arnold P. California at 5:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shorter Clifford May
"The cowardly, self-centered UN is pulling out of Baghdad when they should be sending in reinforcements, even though they are all incompetent boobs."
At least that is my take. Judge for yourself.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 4:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fears of Gunman at Congressional Building
MSNBC is reporting that police have just evacuated the Cannon House Office Building in Washington, D.C., where many members of Congress have their offices. The action was taken after a man with what appeared to be a handgun ran into the building. The House of Representatives has recessed.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 2:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rewriting History
Frederick's earlier post on the Hal Lindsey column, in which he argues that America is great because, while everyone else is fleeing Baghdad, we are staying to fight, reminded me that I have been seeing a lot conservatives making the argument that Clinton sent the wrong message when he pulled US forces out of Somalia following the deaths of 18 Army Rangers in 1993.
(I haven't bothered to track down an actual example of people making this argument, but I am sure that I could do so if someone wanted to call me on it.)
As they see it, pulling our troops out of Somalia essentially told the terrorists that the US will retreat as soon as we lose some soldiers. Now that things are not going particularly well in Iraq, they are saying that we must stay in order to counter this impression.
So I thought I'd hunt down some statements from the days immediately following the "Black Hawk Down" incident 15 October 1993 Houston Chronicle
Senate Republican leader Bob Dole of Kansas said the compromise "does give the president flexibility and it does protect American forces. We have an American plan now, and we're going to get out of there, no question about it.''
Somalia critics led by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, pushed for an immediate withdrawal and offered a second amendment that would provide only funding necessary to withdraw the troops.
"Can we justify more funerals of young Americans over the next six months based on a policy none of us can define?'' asked Gramm. Gramm voted against the Byrd amendment.
[edit]
"To me, and I believe the majority of the American people, that (release) removes the last impediment to the total, rapid, prompt and safe withdrawal of American troops in Somalia,'' said McCain, a former Vietnam prisoner-of-war. "There is no reason for the United States of America to remain in Somalia.''
9 October 1993 Chicago Sun-Times
The Clinton administration made "a terrible mistake . . . in underestimating the strength" of Somali warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid, Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) said Friday.
Hyde, senior Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also said he fears President Clinton is making "another mistake" by announcing a March 31 deadline for withdrawing U.S. troops instead of leaving the date "open-ended . . . and getting out earlier."
[edit]
And if "we're going to protect our troops that are left, we're probably going to have to expand our resources" with more troops, he conceded.
"But then we should get out - and I don't see why that should take six months," Hyde said.
6 October 1993 The Seattle Times
Any military presence in Somalia is facing growing opposition on Capitol Hill, where Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., yesterday urged Clinton to "declare victory and get out."
"Remaining in Somalia will only cost more U.S. lives, squander U.S. power and commit the United States to an unending quagmire from which we cannot easily withdraw," Lott said.
6 October 1993 Orlando Sentinel
"If we had a vote today, we'd be out today," Sen. Robert Dole of Kansas, the Republican leader, said. But, he added: "We can't get out with hostages there." "We went in to save their dying children and now they parade the slain bodies of our youth," said Rep. John Mica, R- Winter Park, one of nearly two dozen House members who took the floor Tuesday to demand that U.S. forces be withdrawn immediately. "I cannot accept any more killing."
5 October 1993 The Washington Post
"As the body bags pile up in Mogadishu, the confusion over U.S. objectives increases," said Senate Minority Leader Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.), who called on President Clinton to send Congress next week a "blueprint for how and when the U.S. leaves Somalia for good."
To be fair, several Democrats were voicing similar concerns and demands but the idea that it was Clinton alone who caved to terrorists is a pathetic attempt to rewrite history.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 2:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stick a Fork in Gephardt -- He's Done
The new issue of Business Week is reporting that Howard Dean is expected to get the endorsement of the AFL-CIO's largest union, the 1.3 million-member Service Employees International Union. SEIU is supposed to announce the endorsement on Nov. 6.
Business Week's Aaron Bernstein writes:"The SEIU's action, coming shortly after Dean won pledges from two small unions, the International Union of Painters and the California Teachers Assn., goes a long way toward completing the transformation of the former Vermont governor from a niche candidate backed by limousine liberals, antiwar activists, and tech-savvy young people into a mainstream candidate who can also connect with blue-collar America ..... The SEIU's move would effectively kill AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney's efforts to gather labor behind Dean rival Representative Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.). Until the painters and the teachers acted on Oct. 27, Gephardt, a staunch union ally during his quarter-century in Congress, had a virtual lock on labor leaders." Business Week adds:"Gephardt's problem is even greater among rank-and-file voters, many of whom are responding to Dean's fierce, unapologetic partisanship. An early October poll of likely Democratic caucus voters in Michigan, a must-win state for Gephardt, showed Dean with twice as much support among union members."
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 2:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Ted Said
I like Ted Rall's cartoons, although both those and his blog can be more than a bit over-the-top for my taste sometimes. But as a New Yorker who lives and works downtown, I absolutely agree with his analysis of the "Necropublican" convention next year. Moving the convention to an extremely late date (requiring some states to change their ballot-access laws so that Bush could be officially nominated later than Sept. 1 and still qualify for the general election ballot), just so the Republicans can exploit the 9/11 anniversary for partisan advantage, and doing it all in front of folks who are only too aware of how badly we've been treated by the administration (promises of money that never came, lies about poisons in our air, and such) is a really, really, really bad idea.
As Rall says, I hope it doesn't turn violent, but there will surely be plenty of anger simmering here. I think the most likely spark to ignite a conflagration would be if the Secret Service or NYPD insists on keeping protesters in "free speech zones" that are nowhere near the convention site (Madison Square Garden) or Ground Zero when Bush goes there. I could see people trying to push their way past the cops and one shove leading to another until real violence broke out. I pray it doesn't come to that; if it does, there will be plenty of folks to blame, including any protesters who start something, but I know who will be #1 on my list of evildoers.
posted by
Arnold P. California at 1:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shake Hands With the Devil
p. 401 We continued along lanes and paths that often took us through the middle of villages that did not appear on any map. In one village, we stopped to wait for all the vehicles to catch up to us. The path we were on had been one of the exit trails used by people fleeing Kigali. There were remnants of a barrier here, and many people had been killed and thrown in the ditches and on the sides of the road. As I got out to wait, I looked at the bodies, which seem relatively fresh. Just as I glimpsed the body of a child, it moved. I wasn't sure if it was my imagination, but I saw the twitching of the child and wanted to help. I leaned down to pick the child up, and suddenly I was holding a little body that was both tingling and mushy in my hands. In a second I realized that the movement was not the child but the action of maggots. I was frozen, not wanting to fling the child away from me but also not wanting to hold it for a second longer. I managed to set the body down and then stood there, shaky, not wanting to think about what was on my hands.
p. 430 We saw many faces of death during the genocide, from the innocence of babies to the bewilderment of the elderly, from the defiance of fighters to the resigned stares of nuns. I saw so many faces and try now to remember each one. Early on I seemed to develop a screen between me and the sights and sounds to allow me to stay focused on the work to be done. For a long time I completely wiped the death masks of raped and sexually mutilated girls and women from my mind as if what had been done to them was the last thing that would send me over the edge.
But if you looked, you could see the evidence, even in the whitened skeletons. The legs bent apart; a bottle broken, a rough branch, even a knife between them. Where the bodies were fresh, we saw what must have been semen pooled on and near the dead women and girls. There was always a lot of blood. Some male corpses had their genitals cut off, but many women and young girls had their breasts chopped off and their genitals crudely cut apart. They died in a position of total vulnerability, flat on their backs, with their legs bent and knees wide apart. It was the expressions on their dead faces that assaulted me the most, a frieze of shock, pain and humiliation.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 1:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What a Country! What a Moron!
In long-winded and syrupy prose, ultra-conservative writer Hal Lindsey explains in this column why Iraq proves that American is such a great country. Actually, Iraq only proves why America is such a lonely country these days -- unable to find many nations that will help pay for the occupation and reconstruction efforts there. But Lindsey offers a very different spin.
In his column, entitled "America the Beautiful" (you can start humming now), Lindsey waxes on about how noble America (the Bush administration) is for getting the U.S. knee-deep in a quagmire that no one else wants to join. Lindsey writes:"The world community has largely turned its back on the newly freed Iraqis. The Red Cross, U.N. and Doctors Without Borders cut and ran from Iraq following attacks by the very people they came to assist." Yes, the Red Cross is pulling personnel out, but does Lindsey seriously think this decision was made just for the hell of it? Uh, perhaps it had just a little something to do with the fact that the Red Cross' operations were the victim of a suicide bomber a few days ago, and the group had little reason to believe the U.S. forces in Iraq could reasonably assure the safety of their personnel.
As for Doctors Without Borders (DWB), this is a Nobel Prize-winning organization that has long tackled tough and tragic situations that other nations and groups ignored. For example, a few years ago, DWB provided medical personnel to Africa to help treat those afflicted with the highly contagious and high-mortality Ebola virus. Hal, how many trips did you make to African nations ravaged by Ebola? Just curious. When the U.S.-led forces invaded Iraq, DWB was already on the ground there to provide medical care for sick and injured civilians, and it was doing so in the face of U.S. bombing raids on these areas and the arrest of two of its volunteers by Iraqi authorities. Does this sound like a group that "cut and ran"?
Lindsey has more nonsense to offer:"America shouldered the burden –- together with the rest of the attending baggage -– because nobody else would. Not because it's popular. Or because it will be easy. But because it's the right thing to do. What a country!" What a moron.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 1:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Warped Measure of Success for Iraq
A great column, "Eyes Wide Shut," by Maureen Dowd appears in today's New York Times. Dowd writes:Speaking to reporters this week, Mr. Bush made the bizarre argument that the worse things get in Iraq, the better news it is. "The more successful we are on the ground, the more these killers will react," he said. In the Panglossian Potomac, calamities happen for the best.
.... The war began with Bush illogic: false intelligence (from Niger to nuclear) used to bolster a false casus belli (imminent threat to our security) based on a quartet of false premises (that we could easily finish off Saddam and the Baathists, scare the terrorists and democratize Iraq without leeching our economy).
Now Bush illogic continues: The more Americans, Iraqis and aid workers who get killed and wounded, the more it is a sign of American progress. The more dangerous Iraq is, the safer the world is. The more troops we seem to need in Iraq, the less we need to send more troops.
The harder it is to find Saddam, Osama and W.M.D., the less they mattered anyhow. The more coordinated, intense and sophisticated the attacks on our soldiers grow, the more "desperate" the enemy is.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 12:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saddam Was A Liar
And that is why we thought he had WMDs. At least that is what Jonah Goldberg argues For weeks Washington has been the site of a colossal game of hot potato over who's to "blame" for the Iraq war. Or, more specifically, who's to blame for the "bad intelligence" over Iraq's as-of-yet-undiscovered stockpiles of WMD.
[edit]
Might I suggest another candidate for the blame? What about Saddam Hussein?
[edit]
Whatever we discover in Iraq at the end of the day, one thing has been crystal clear for a decade: Saddam Hussein very much wanted the world to think he had weapons of mass destruction. If our intelligence was uncertain before the war, that made his behavior all the more suspicious and therefore unacceptable.
Maybe he was bluffing; maybe he thought he had WMDs; maybe he really did have them. Who cares? Saddam played games. And we said very clearly that after 9-11 we were in no mood to play games anymore - especially on the issue of WMD because, unlike a gun, by the time you know for sure it's loaded, it's too late to do anything about it.
I like how Goldberg refers to the "as-of-yet-undiscovered stockpiles" of weapons, not the "nonexistent stockpiles." Goldberg still thinks they'll be found, but he also hedges his bets by arguing that if they aren't, it is because Hussein mislead us into thinking that he had them and therefore we had no choice but to act. He even offers this analogy as proof Look at it this way. Imagine you're a cop. You've chased down a known felon and violent criminal who you have every reason to believe is in possession of a gun. You say, "Put your hands up!" And instead he plays games, keeping his hands behind his back. You say, "Let me see your hands" and he shows you them one at a time, like a little kid playing keep-away. Finally, you say, "Look, if you don't cooperate there are going to be some serious consequences; I'm going to make you cooperate."
Goldberg's solution to this sort of situation is apparently to simply shoot the criminal, for his own safety regardless of whether or not the criminal actually has a gun. In fact, Goldberg doesn't seem particularly concerned about that at all. So long as he, or the United States, perceive a threat, they are free to act in any way they deem necessary.
On the other hand, if the policeman (the US) thought that a criminal (North Korea) actually did have a gun (nuclear weapons), then he'd probably call for back-up and try to negotiate an end the stand off without violence.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 12:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back Scratching for Dollars
The Center for Public Integrity proves what we always suspected--that the Bush Administration has been awarding contracts in Iraq to major campaign donors. Here's the scoop from the AP:
Companies awarded $8 billion in contracts to rebuild Iraq and Afghanistan have been major campaign donors to President Bush, and their executives have had important political and military connections, according to a study released Thursday.
The study of more than 70 U.S. companies and individual contractors turned up more than $500,000 in donations to the president's 2000 campaign, more than they gave collectively to any other politician over the past dozen years. The complete CPI report is available here.
posted by
Noam Alaska at 11:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diplomatic Immunity
Staunch Moderate alerts us to this item about a Senate amendment that would reduce the amount of foreign aid going to countries by whatever they owe in unpaid parking tickets, plus an additional 10 percent penalty. The measure would apply to tickets and fines incurred in New York City and Washington, D.C., in the period from April 1, 1997, to Sept. 30, 2003.
Many embassies reside in Washington, and New York is home to the United Nations.
The provision would help New York City recover up to $21 million owed for 186,000 unpaid tickets, according to Schumer's office. The secretary of state can waive the penalties if it is in the national interest.
Schumer's office said that among the major offenders are Egypt, which owes nearly $2 million from 17,825 tickets; Kuwait, which owes $1.2 million from 11,122 violations; and Nigeria, in arrears almost $1 million from 8,520 violations.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 11:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emily Post and Feigned Gullibility
In the battles over federal judicial confirmations, one feature I've found alternately amusing and irritating is the way that the rules of decorum seem to require nominees to offer ritualized statements that aren't true and Senators to pretend to be blithering idiots by accepting the statements at face value.
The most famous example is probably Clarence Thomas's claim in 1991 never to have discussed Roe v. Wade. Thomas also said he believed that the Constitution guaranteed a right to privacy, and that right wasn't limited to married couples--a belief that he expressly repudiated in his dissent last Term in Lawrence v. Texas (the sodomy case). Sen. DeConcini of Arizona cited Thomas's statement as a key reason for his crossing party lines to vote for Thomas, who could not have been confirmed (by a 52-48 vote) without some Democratic votes.
This is not to say that there is a right to privacy in the Constitution, or that Thomas's contrary view is unreasonable or should disqualify him from sitting on the Court. It's just that the rules of the game were that he had to lie about what he thought or the Democrats would have voted him down en bloc; and, once he lied, folks like DeConcini had cover to vote for him, when everything about his career and writings cast serious doubt on what he had said. (I don't mean to imply anything about whether Thomas lied regarding the Anita Hill allegations, or whether Senators who voted for him were overly gullible in believing him or even merely pretended to believe him, though I do have my views on that subject as well).
The ritualistic lying isn't always about a nominee's jurisprudential views, as we see in this item about Fourth Circuit nominee Claude Allen from the Richmond Times-Dispatch:
He was asked about a news story published during a political campaign between Helms, R-N.C., and then-North Carolina Gov. James Hunt Jr. that quoted Allen as saying Hunt was vulnerable because of his links "with the queers."
Allen testified he used the word "queer" in its dictionary meaning from that time, or "odd, out of the ordinary, unusual. I did not use the word as pejorative; I did not use the word to denigrate any individual or any group." Is this even minimally plausible? Can anyone doubt what Allen was talking about? Again, it's a separate question whether that remark, either alone or in combination with other parts of his record, should merit the Senate's rejection of the appointment; but why should everyone pretend that he didn't say it? (Allen also used another hackneyed verbal formula: "Moreover, he apologized to anybody who might have been offended by his use of the word, Allen said." I can't blame him for that, since this craven, mealy-mouthed approach seems de rigeur for any public apology these days.)
Actually, there's a much bigger problem facing Allen's nomination: he's from Virginia. The vacancy Allen is slated to fill traditionally goes to someone from Maryland, and Maryland's two Senators are furious. The reason Bush didn't pick a Marylander probably has to do with another Senate tradition: the "blue slip," which (under Sen. Hatch's recent loosening of the rules) means that a nominee has to have the approval of at least one home-state Senator before the nomination can go forward. Both Maryland Senators are Democrats, meaning Bush would probably have had to nominate a moderate to get their sign-off.
But the Fourth Circuit's state allocations are messed up to begin with, thanks in part to Allen's old mentor Jesse Helms, who (under Hatch's previous, tighter version of the blue-slip rule), was able singlehandedly to block every Clinton nominee from North Carolina--which, in another twist, was in revenge for the Democrats' failure to vote on the appointment of another Helms protege when the first President Bush nominated him. Eventually, Clinton gave a North Carolina seat to Virginian Roger Gregory. At the time, Hatch criticized Clinton's move, saying Clinton "just stuck his finger in the eyes of the North Carolina senators." To his credit, Hatch recognizes the same concerns in Allen's case, saying of Maryland's Senators Mikulski and Sarbanes: "They care deeply about it. I don't blame them. If I was in their shoes, I'd be making the same arguments they are. And I've got to find some way of resolving it. I'll do my best."
And I'll bet you would have thought that there couldn't be anything interesting about the nomination of an African-American who used to work for Jesse Helms.
posted by
Arnold P. California at 10:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Means No - Just Not For Men
Imagine if a college administrator said something like this in regards to legislation crafted to stop rape on campus We know, I know that it is nowhere near what the legislation characterized it to be. We're not naive enough to say that it doesn't exist from time to time. Typically when it does exist, it's a consensual sex act and typically one that's gone bad.
How long would it be before that person was fired?
But that was the response of Reginald Wilkinson, head of the Ohio Department of Corrections and president of the Association of State Correctional Administrators, in an NPR story last night on the Prison Rape Elimination Act (listen here, scroll down to "Rights Groups Hail Prison Rape Law.")
It is nice to see that those in positions of authority are taking this problem seriously.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 9:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just Switch Parties Already
From CNN (via Southern Appeal) Democratic Sen. Zell Miller of Georgia said Wednesday he will endorse President Bush in the coming presidential election.
"This does not mean I am going to become a Republican," Miller said in a written statement. "It simply means that in the year 2004, this Democrat will vote for George Bush."
I don't care who Miller endorses or votes for, but I am getting a little tired of him continuing to call himself a Democrat when he disagrees with his party on almost everything because all it does is give Republicans an excuse to claim they are being bipartisan as they try to ram through their agenda.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 9:11 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, October 29, 2003 |
|
|
|
Questions About Kucinich's NAFTA Promise
Ed Garvey, the longtime political and labor activist in Wisconsin, has usually been a welcome voice on these and other issues. But his recent column endorsing the presidential bid of Dennis Kucinich isn't terribly persuasive. One of the reasons he gives for this support is one on which I must part company with Garvey and the left-most wing of the Democratic party.
In the Capital-Times of Madison, Garvey writes:" ... when I look at the decimation of our manufacturing base nationally and in Wisconsin, I want clear answers on the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. Kucinich boldly stakes out his position. 'On the first day of my presidency, I will cancel NAFTA and WTO.' " But a bad position, stated boldly, is still a bad position. I too have concerns about NAFTA, but I don't support its unilateral cancellation. After all, NAFTA is an economic treaty between different nations. Just as the Bush administration is far too prone toward unilateral action in foreign policy, it would be wrong for a Kucinich administration to immediately and unilaterally declare a regional trade agreement "dead" without, first, talking with Mexico and trying to address those areas where legitimate issues have been raised -- e.g., environmental and labor standards.
I don't believe that poverty and quality-of-life issues in the Third World will ever be addressed if we cling to the notion that all medium- to low-skilled manufacturing jobs somehow "belong" forever to America. Even if we wanted this to happen, the die is cast and using protectionist approaches to trade are unlikely to succeed.
The debate of "this NAFTA" versus "no NAFTA" is a false choice. Kucinich should know better. And he should also know that at least some of our recent job losses in manufacturing are the product of the anemic U.S. economy, not NAFTA.
Why not consider another approach? 1) Prepare our young people and re-train workers for high-skill jobs, provide extended unemployment coverage and health care for those workers who suffer dislocation in these industries; and 2) Accept the reality that these low- to medium-skilled jobs will slowly, but steadily, flow to Third World nations and make that transition one of progress, not exploitation, by using our leverage with Mexico to negotiate a phase-in of environmental/labor standards.
Completely scrapping NAFTA may give Kucinich and labor unions a nice rush, but does it really address the core, long-term issues? And does it constitute a kind of unilateralism that more reflects the thinking of our current president?
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 7:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Or what's left of it.
Between the fires and the other Arnold, this is one rainy day here in the East when I'm not kicking myself for leaving California.
posted by
Arnold P. California at 3:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would You Like To Be Blacklisted?
The NRA Institute for Legislative Action has complied an extensive list of hundreds of corporations, organizations, celebrities, national figures, journalists, and media outlets for its supporters to boycott.
As the NRA explains it The following organizations have lent monetary, grassroots or some other type of direct support to anti-gun organizations. In many instances, these organizations lent their name in support of specific campaigns to pass anti-gun legislation such as the March 1995 HCI "Campaign to Protect Sane Gun Laws." Many of these organizations were listed as "Campaign Partners," for having pledged to fight any efforts to repeal the Brady Act and the Clinton "assault weapons" ban. All have officially endorsed anti-gun positions.
The list really is quite impressive. And if you'd like to join it, you can petition to be added here.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 3:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message From the Blogger Formerly Known as Publius
The Demagogues, tiring of my incessant comments on their posts, apparently had no alternative but to distract me with a chance to do a few posts of my own. I eagerly accepted with thanks, and I hope I can make the occasional useful contribution.
I've adopted a Demagogue-style name (yes, there is a town called Arnold, California), with the middle initial a reminder of my old handle. California is on my mind lately because, as I commented on a recent post, I grew up there and my parents, grandmother, aunt, uncle, and cousin were all evacuated from their homes because of the fires (they are all safe and back home after a couple of nights away).
I'd call myself liberal on most social issues, center-left on economic policy, and a skeptic on most occasions of the use of force in foreign policy, even when a humanitarian justification is proffered. I'm a lawyer, so I imagine I'll be writing from time to time on developments in the courts and the legislatures. As those who have been following the comments recently know, I get quite exercised about women's rights, gay rights, and civil rights in general, but you can rest assured that if I ever detect oppression of us straight white men, I will not hesitate to speak truth to power.
I'm happy to be here. I hope I don't mess up too badly.
posted by
Arnold P. California at 3:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introducing Condi Rice the "Unsticker"
No one has ever accused George W. Bush of being the most literate or cogent speaker of the English language. Yet, judging from this transcript of yesterday's presidential news conference, Bush continues to suffer from what might best be called diarrhea of the mouth. Here's a verbal exchange that took place (elipsis was in original transcript):REPORTER: "You recently put Condoleezza Rice, your national security adviser, in charge of the management of the administration's Iraq policy. What has effectively changed since she's been in charge?"
PRESIDENT BUSH: "[Condoleezza Rice's] job is to coordinate interagency. She's doing a fine job of coordinating interagency . . . and to help unstick things that may get stuck. That's the best way to put it. She's an unsticker and -- is she listening? Okay, well, she's doing a fine job." Now that's informative. Frankly, his comments are not only tortured in grammatical and syntactical terms, but his final remark may reflect a degree of condescension. I didn't watch the news conference so the jury is out on this, but the transcript at least suggests that Bush's praise of Rice -- "she's doing a fine job" -- was possibly designed for her consumption as much as the public's. Bush offered that praise right after he asked someone (an aide or reporter?) "is she listening?"
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 3:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bush is a Great Leader - Just Like Napoleon
So says Tony Blankley When Napoleon was asked what distinguished a great leader from a regular politician, he explained that it was not innate intelligence, but rather the mental power "de fixer les objets longtemps sans etre fatigue" (to concentrate on objectives for long periods without tiring.) While most other politicians (certainly including most of the Democratic Party presidential aspirants) have long since tired of the mental and emotional strain of staring into the terrorism abyss, the president continues to focus and to act.
If Bush has one overarching strength, we all know that it is his ability to concentrate his massive intellect on the task at hand and never lose focus.
But most importantly, we are safer because Having started the process of rolling back terrorism (however falteringly or imperfectly), we are more secure than if we had not yet started. So again, just in case you had forgotten, there are only two options for dealing with terrorists: start a war in Iraq or do nothing.
All of which again raises the question I have asked myself many times: just how uninformed and illogical does an column or op-ed have to be in order to be rejected by the Washington Times?
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 2:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shake Hands With the Devil
After 10 Belgian peacekeepers had been tortured and killed on the first day of the genocide, the UN reduced UNAMIR's force from 2500 to 250. In May, they changed UNAMIR's mandate and ordered a rapid deployment of a 5500 member force, known as UNAMIR II.
Dallaire explains what happend during the deployment of the new mission - p. 375-376 The United States and the United Kingdom committed other acts of sabotage on deployment to Rwanda. For instance, I had long been arguing with New York that RTLM [Hutu hate-radio] had to be shut down, as it was a direct instrument in promoting genocide. The UN did not have the means to stop the broadcasts, either through jamming, a direct air strike on the transmitter, or covert operations, but it made a formal request of the United States, which had the means to try all three. The issue was studied by the Pentagon, which in due course recommended against conducting the operation because of the cost - $8,500 an hour for a jamming aircraft over the country - and the legal dilemma. Bandwidth within a nation is owned by the nation, and jamming a national radio station would violate international convention on national sovereignty. The Pentagon judged that the lives of the estimated 8,000-10,000 Rwandans killed each day during the genocide were not worth the cost of fuel or the violation of Rwandan airwaves. The death toll, which was estimated at 200,000 by the end of April, reached 500,000 by the end of May and 800,000 by the end of June.
I had judged that we needed one hundred APCs to be effective on the ground. The DPKO [UN Dept. of Peacekeeping Operations] approached forty-four nations to give, lend or lease APCs to the troop-contributing countries to equip their forces. The United States, with its vast unused Cold War stocks of APCs eventually supplied fifty. As soon as the United States offered anything at all, the DPKO stopped searched for other donors. And then the stalling began: staff with the Pentagon were reluctant to put their vehicles into central Africa and seemed content to let them rust in German depots. They badgered the DPKO with questions, and staff there passed the questions on to me. Then the United States decided that the APCs could not be given to the mission but would have to be leased and that the lease would have to be negotiated. Eventually they came up with the price of $4 million, which they insisted had to be pre-paid. When the issue was raised of transporting the carries to Kampala to link them up with the Ghanaians who needed to be trained to operate them, the United States insisted upon another $6 million to cover the cost of air transport. After the funding was secured - another time consuming exercise - the APCs were airlifted to Entebbe [in Uganda]; after much negotiations with Uganda, they arrived stripped of machine guns, radios, tools, spare part, training manuals and so on. The United States, in effect, delivered tons of rusting metal to Entebbe. We were without trucks to transport the APCs to Kigali and had no drivers trained to operate them.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 1:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.I.P. -- Camille Paglia
Here lies the proof that Camille Paglia is dead. As evidenced by the passage below, Paglia's own enormous ego has finally fully consumed her.
Now and then one sees the claim that Kausfiles was the first blog. I beg to differ: I happen to feel that my Salon column was the first true blog. My columns had punch and on-rushing velocity. They weren't this dreary meta-commentary, where there's a blizzard of fussy, detached sections nattering on obscurely about other bloggers or media moguls and Washington bureaucrats. I took hits at media excesses, but I directly commented on major issues and personalities in politics and pop culture.
I know it's hard for people not familiar with her earlier days to imagine, but at one time Paglia really was a brilliant, insightful and thought-provoking essayist who wrote sharply and eloquently about history, art, and politics. Few other modern thinkers celebrated the complex nature of sexuality and expression like Paglia. I'll always admire her for the time she stood up against the protectionist, "feminist" anti-sex police --MacKinnon & Dworkin-- when few others dared to do so.
Sadly, she has become nothing more than a contrarian addicted to controversies of her own making. She has taken too many illogical leaps and bounds and has too much pride in the inconsistencies of her beliefs and allegiances to even resemble the woman who wrote Sexual Personae.
Rest in Peace, dear Camille. You are missed.
posted by
Zoe Kentucky at 11:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can You Trust Your Own Government?
After spending 20 years in prison (10 of them in solitary confinement) for supposedly smuggling arms to Libya, Edwin Wilson has had his conviction thrown out. It turns out that the shipment for which he received a 52-year prison sentence was requested by the CIA Wilson claimed he shipped 20 tons of plastic explosives out of Houston Intercontinental Airport at the request of the CIA. The federal government denied this, and at the heart of the case against him was a CIA affidavit submitted by prosecutors stating Wilson had not done any work for the CIA since his retirement in February 1971.
But U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes spelled out in his order vacating Wilson's conviction, that the CIA forwarded a memo to the U.S. attorney's office a few days after he was convicted -- but before he was sentenced -- alerting them that they had since discovered at least five projects Wilson had worked on for the CIA after 1971 -- including a planned trip to Iran with the CIA's deputy director.
The CIA forwarded the memo to the U.S. attorney's office, Hughes said, but after debating the issue for months, decided not to inform Wilson's attorneys. Wilson appealed, but the government failed to acknowledge that the affidavit was false.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 11:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps The Stupidest Article Ever
Thanks for this uninformative piece of crap Rocky Mountain News Is it John Kerry's Beatles-era haircut that doesn't appeal to students sporting today's shorter styles?
A waffle breakfast for the Massachusetts senator and Democratic president hopeful drew only about 10 people at the University of Colorado on Tuesday, even as several thousand rallied for political rival Howard Dean outside.
The waffles were symbolic of what Kerry's supporters say is Dean's waffling on issues.
"He's never been afraid to stand up for what he believes in," said Meininger, a 21-year-old senior majoring in history and political science.
Photographs on the wall showed Kerry with hair combed neatly over his ears. One showed him with John Lennon.
"I think that's just him. He's had long hair for a long time. That's who he is, and that's what's so great about John Kerry - he's not afraid to be himself," said Meininger, who has short hair.
"He does need a haircut," said Eric Morgan, a graduate student in history who was eating a waffle. "I think if he trimmed it back, it would be nice."
Michele Buckley, a leader of the campus Democrats and an organizer of the Dean rally, said the former Vermont governor's short haircut helps on campus.
Buckley doubts the slogan on Dean's signs - "the Dean Generation" - will be the same turnoff to older voters that Kerry's hair is to youth.
"The older generation has been the younger generation," she said.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 11:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Targeting Feingold
The RNC plans to target Russ Feingold by highlighting his votes against the PATRTIOT Act and the "Partial Birth Abortion" ban Republicans will target U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold and Rep. Ron Kind as they try to increase their majorities in Congress and win Wisconsin for President Bush in next year's elections, the national GOP chairman said Tuesday.
The Republican Party has marked Wisconsin as a key battleground state for the 2004 race ever since Bush lost the state to Al Gore in 2000 by fewer than 6,000 votes.
Chairman Ed Gillespie stopped short of calling Wisconsin a must-win for Bush but said the president and Republicans will visit here frequently in an effort to win Wisconsin for the first time since Ronald Reagan did it in 1984.
I encourge them to bring it on. But I also encourage you to join me in giving him some money.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 10:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support the Troops, GOP-style!
Congress nixes extra pay for some troops
Oct. 29, 2003 | WASHINGTON (AP) -- House-Senate negotiators considering an $87 billion package for Iraq and Afghanistan have rejected a Democratic proposal to compensate federal employees on active duty with the National Guard and reserves.
The proposal by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., would have made up the differences between the workers' regular salaries and their service incomes, as many states and private employers are already doing. He said 23,000 federal employees would be affected.
The Senate had included the provision in its version of the Iraq spending bill, but senators in the conference agreed to eliminate it Tuesday in a 16-13 vote that was mainly along party lines.
Perhaps the Dems should call a press conference and announce that they're going to take the raise they're about to receive and give it to these troops. It would help highlight two highly symbolic issues at once, both that would be in the Dems favor. So how about it?
posted by
Zoe Kentucky at 10:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, October 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
Rumsfeld the Truth-Teller
At a recent dinner honoring Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, your friend and mine -- former Senator Jesse Helms -- praised Rumsfeld for supposedly offering "no spin" when he is questioned by the media. Here's what Helms said on Oct. 18:"I wish you could be in the den of our home sometime when Don Rumsfeld is being interviewed by the press, how he can handle it. He makes in most cases, certainly a lot of them, regret that they asked the question the way they did. [Laughter] It's a pleasure and delight to watch some of them in the press to try to twist a question so that they can get the wrong answer to the right question .... There is no spin with this gentleman. He tells the truth. He always calls it as he sees it. And America is lucky to have him serving at such a critical time." Of course, Helms' statement was made just before the press reported on a memo written by Rumsfeld (and leaked by God knows who) that revealed the huge gap between his public reassurances on Iraq and his private misgivings and fears. I don't know what Helms ate at that dinner, but, right now, he's eating his own words.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 3:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shake Hands With the Devil
Pages 297-298 The hospitals remained operational throughout the genocide thanks to the efforts of Phillipe Gaillard and the International Committee of the Red Cross, backed by Medecins Sans Frontieres and the Canadian doctor and Somalia veteran James Orbinski. But at what cost. Fifty-six Rwandans working for the Red Cross would be killed before the conflict was over, a few white doctors and nurses would be injured and hundreds of Rwandan casualties would be pulled out of ambulances and slaughtered on the spot. On one trip to the city centre, I saw a white Red Cross van, angled on the road, riddled with bullet holes. Smoke was coming out of the engine compartment and all the windows were smashed. The passenger door was open and a Rwandan in a Red Cross vest was hanging down, facing us, with blood oozing from his head in a slow, steady stream. The back doors were open and a body on a stretcher was still inside, with another held up on the bumper. There were three other casualties, their white and bloodied gauze dressings spun around them. One body had no head. Five blood-spattered youths sat on the curb, smoking cigarettes beside the ambulance. Their machetes were stained red. At most they may have been fifteen years old.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 3:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Perle's Crystal Ball
Remember when Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told Congress in March that in the case of Iraq, the U.S. was "dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon"? Well, that wasn't the only unrealistic prediction that Bush advisers and confidants made back in March.
Richard Perle is the former chairman of the Defense Policy Board and is considered an architect of the Bush doctrine vis-a-vis Iraq. Last night on CNN's "Lou Dobbs Tonight," the host reminded Perle and his viewers of a particularly rosy prediction offered by Perle in March:DOBBS: "When you and I talked at one point during the war, in mid-March of this year, you said you believed that the French and the Germans and other critics of the Bush administration's Iraq policy would fall in line as soon as the war were ended, as soon as it became clear that Saddam was a non-entity. That has not been the case. What is your assessment of the French and the German policy post- Saddam Hussein?"
PERLE: "Well, I think it's appalling, having professed concern about the people of Iraq, when the time came to make a contribution to their reconstruction, they couldn't find the euro to put in the till. And that tells you more than all their words about how much they care about the people of Iraq. It's an appalling failure of responsibility on their part." Frankly, I think some criticism of France is appropriate -- not because the French were wrong to challenge America's call for an invasion, but because the French never truly offered an alternative plan to enforce UN resolutions that Iraq had violated. France's only alternative was offered at the 11th hour and raised as many questions as it answered. Having said that, Perle ignores the relevant concerns that France and Germany have raised about the U.S. occupation that have not received a clear response -- for example, the issue of a timetable for a transition to Iraqi self-rule.
More significantly, Perle's March prediction strongly suggests that the pro-war voices within the White House and GOP may have made a lackluster attempt to build a strong, accurate case for invading Iraq precisely because they just assumed our European allies would eventually have no choice but to lend their full support to the U.S.
As time has proven, however, this was a foolish assumption that will impose huge long-term costs (financial and otherwise) on the American people.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 2:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If You Have A Point To Make, Don't Let Facts Get In Your Way
Pinky Weyrich weighs in today on the issue of judicial nominations Larson Frisby of the ABA was kind enough to provide me with the ABA ratings for the 108th Congress. The ABA has two categories for such nominees, Qualified and Well Qualified. Remember all of the circuit court nominees that liberals claim are extremist? Miguel Estrada, Carolyn Kuhl, Patricia Owen, Charles Pickering, William Pryor, Claude Allen, and Janice Rogers Brown come to mind. Every one of these has been judged "well qualified" either unanimously or by a substantial majority. Not a single nominee was graded simply "qualified."
First of all, her name is PRISCILLA Owen, not Patricia. And secondly, the ABA has 3 categories: Well Qualified, Qualified and Not Qualified. Thirdly, only four of those nominees Weyrich listed received either unanimous or majority "Well Qualified" ratings (Estrada, Owen, Kuhl and Pickering.)
But he is right that none of the nominees were rated simply as "qualified" - Pryor, Allen and Brown were all rated "Qualified/Not Qualified" meaning that as least some on the ABA review board thought them unqualified for the positions to which they have been nominated.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 12:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defector
The Washington Post reports that the highest ranking defector from the North Korean regime is scheduled to come to the US to meet with members of Congress, as well as Bush administration and State Department officials North Korea's highest-ranking defector, who has been kept under heavy guard by the South Korean government for six years, left for Washington on Monday on a 10-day trip to discuss the North in meetings with Bush administration officials and Senate leaders.
The defector, Hwang Jang Yop, is known as the chief architect of North Korea's official juche, or self-reliance, ideology. He was a confidant of Kim Il Sung, North Korea's late leader, and a mentor to Kim Jong Il, who succeeded his father.
Hwang was interviewed for a recent New York Times Magazine cover story about Kim Jong Il and here is what he had to say ''If I were to go into details, it would take many days,'' he said. ''As a politician or leader who can work for the development of the state and the happiness of the people, he is an F student, a dropout. But as a dictator he has an excellent ability. He can organize people so that they can't move, can't do anything, and he can keep them under his ideology. As far as I know, the present North Korean dictatorial system is the most precise and thorough in history.''
Hwang says that he believes foreign aid has helped Kim by providing the resources he needs to retain the loyalty of his core constituencies -- the military and party elites. Hwang says he does not believe Kim would ever allow foreign aid and investment to benefit the people who need it; Kim has shown no interest in his people's material well-being, and given the choice between regime survival and national prosperity, it's pretty clear which he would prefer. A few years ago, Kim began letting South Koreans visit the north, and this was seen as a relaxation of the isolation of his information-starved subjects. But the tourists, whose visits provide much-needed hard currency to the regime, are shepherded in quarantinelike conditions that make them virtual prisoners; contact with ordinary North Koreans is nil. Hwang says outsiders are naive to believe that Kim is ready to open up his country.
''South Korea is being fooled, and the Chinese, who should know best,'' he said. ''A considerable number of people are being fooled, including the United States.''
Keeping in mind that Hwang is a high-ranking, outspoken defector, this sort of North Korean blackmail, though shameful, is not particularly surprising In an apparent attempt to prevent Hwang from becoming too talkative in Washington, North Korean authorities have reportedly advised the South Koreans that Hwang's eldest son was recently "injured" in an accident and has been brought to Pyongyang for observation, according to Japan's Sankei newspaper.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 10:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Service Announcement
Do a few good deeds for the day by doing very little.
Click here to help feed hungry people. And here to help needy children get basic health care. And click here to help feed a homeless dog or cat. And here to help fight breast cancer.
Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
posted by
Zoe Kentucky at 10:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Delusion
On my way into work this morning I heard Senator James Inhofe defend the Bush Administration's environmental record with most absurd rhetorical defense ever-- he said that President Bush has the best environmental record of any U.S. President, ever. (Unfortunately I don't have a source for this quote just yet. I'll post it as soon as I do.)
I've been trying to figure out how info actually believes that. Apparently some folks are quite fuzzy on the concept of what it means to have a good environmental record. Apparently "good" actually means "abysmal" and having an "abysmal" record is a very good thing.
If this is the case, then it's not so hard to understand why Inhofe thinks Michael O. Leavitt's environmental record makes him the ideal candidate to be the director of the EPA. Leavitt's record is rather outstanding, while he was governor of Utah the state did tie for last place among the states for failing to enforce the Clean Water Act. Leavitt also got rid of a few government workers-- biologists who kept tabs on endangered species-- and replaced them with biologists who were given orders to refrain from identifying endangered species. One of Leavitt's favorite ways to protect and preserve the environment is by making secret deals to build new roads through millions of acres of wildlife. Then there's Leavitt's modern energy policy, which consisted of promoting the increased use of coal by building new coal plants and mining more coal. Not only is coal one of the dirtiest sources for energy but most everyone else is interested in finding less polluting, renewable sources of energy. Now that's a good environmental record!
posted by
Zoe Kentucky at 9:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monday, October 27, 2003 |
|
|
|
Cue the Circus Music
The President is playing trained seal for the Robertson/Dobson/Falwell crowd again. A few weeks ago Bush balanced a ball on his nose...ahem, I mean declared Marriage Protection Week. Now he's going for an encore with Protection from Pornography Week. Whatever Bush has planned for his big finish, he should keep in mind that Dobson is known to be stingy with the treats.
posted by
Helena Montana at 5:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shake Hands With the Devil
The previous excerpt from the book mentioned Canadian Maj. Brent Beardsley, who served as the military assistant to Dallaire for much of the UN peacekeeping mission. He also served as something of a co-author of Dallaire's book.
He too performed heroically during the genocide, and I would like to highlight this episode in particular.
Background: As part of the Arusha Accords, the framework for ending the Rwandan war, a battalion of RPF soldiers were to be garrisoned in the capital of Kigali. They were housed in a hotel attached to the National Assembly known as the CND. The Rwanda Army [RGF] did not like the RPF being stationed in the capital and routinely accused the RPF of using visitors to the CND to smuggle in ammunition and reinforcements. As such, the RGF often stationed soldiers and militia members outside to monitor and harass visitors.
This incident occurred about 3 months before the onset of the genocide It quickly became apparent that members of the mob had attacked a couple who had been visiting the CND, and were now taunting the RPF guards to try to save them.
Brent, realizing how rapidly this situation could escalate, intervened, ordering the RPF to stay inside the compound and not respond to the provocation. Brent and Troute [Phillipe Troute - Belgian para-commando and Dallaire's driver] then plunged into the crowd, certain that they would be backed up by the eight-man Bangladeshi guard unit that was stationed at the entrance to the CND. As they got to the center of the mob, they discovered a man sprawled on the ground with blood splattered everywhere. His face had been sliced almost in two, exposing the blue-white glint of bone. Close by lay a heavily pregnant woman, her arm sliced through the bone and broken. Brent lifted the man onto his shoulder and made directly for the vehicle. As he moved forward with his bloody burden, a man with a machete separated himself from the crowd and stood squarely in Brent's way. Without a second's thought, Brent drove his fist into the man's solar plexus, knocking him to the ground. Troute raised his assault rifle, and the crowd backed off, giving him room to pick up the woman and carry her to safety. It wasn't until Brent and Troute were both back at the vehicle that they realized the Bangladeshi guards were nowhere in sight. They were hiding in the bunker adjacent to the main gate.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 4:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bombings = Success
I am not calling it a failure. I realize that stabilizing Iraq is an incredibly difficult, complicated and time-consuming process, but I am curious to know just what Bush would consider evidence that it is failing.
From the AP President Bush on Monday blamed rising violence in Iraq on U.S. progress being made there, saying coalition successes are making insurgents more desperate.
Bush spoke only hours after bombings in postwar Baghdad killed dozens of people and after conferring at the White House with the top U.S. general and civilian official in Iraq.
"The more progress we make on the ground, the more free the Iraqis become, the more electricity that's available, the more jobs are available, the more kids that are going to school, the more desperate these killers become," Bush told reporters.
But this logic, as things get better on the ground, the bombings will become more "desperate," frequent and deadly. This seems like an odd way to measure success.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 3:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shake Hands With the Devil
Day three of the genocide (pages 279-281) Brent [Beardsley] and a team of MILOBs [military observers] had spent the day conducting rescue missions in one of the APCs. On the first effort, he'd picked up several UN civilian staff and their families and also the Canadian charge d'affiars, Linda Carroll, who was able to provide him with a list of addresses of Canadian expatriates in Kigali.
With Brent that day were Marek Pazik and Stefan Stec, both Polish officers who had briefly been billeted in the Gikondo Polish Church, known as the Polish Mission because it was run by priests from Poland. Pazik and Stefan had not lasted long under the austere regime at the mission, but two of their fellow Polish MILOBs had stayed on. That morning, a faint radio call had come from the men at the mission begging for help. The batteries on the radio were dying and all Brent could make out was that there had been killings at the church.
Not knowing what to expect, Brent, Pazik and Stec armed themselves and, hatches down, set off to Gikondo in the APC with a Bangladeshi officer and three men. Along the route, they passed through fighting between the RGF [Rwandan government forces] and the RPF [rebel Tutsi forces], through Gendarmerie roadblocks and through the ever-increasing and chaotic militia roadblocks. They saw the bodies of men, women and children near these roadblocks. So many civilians were on the move, it looked like the entire population was abandoning Kigali.
At the church, they came to a halt and dismounted. Pazik and a Bangladeshi soldier went to the rectory to find the Polish MILOBs, while Brent and Stec confronted the first evidence of wholesale massacre. Across the street from the mission, an entire alleyway was littered with the bodies of women and children near a hastily abandoned school. As Brent and Stefan were standing there trying to take in the number of bodies, a truck full of armed men roared by. Stefan went inside while Brent stood by the unbelievable horror - the first such scene UNAMIR witnessed - evidence of the genocide, though we didn't yet call it that. In the aisles and on the pews were the bodies of hundreds of men, women and children. At least fifteen of them were still alive but in a terrible state. The priests were applying first aid to the survivors. A baby cried as it tried to feed on the breast of its dead mother, a sight Brent has never forgotten. Pazik found the two Polish MILOBs, who were in a state of grief and shock, hardly able to relate what had happened. They night before, they said, the RGF had cordoned off the area, and the Gendarmerie had gone door to door checking identity cards. All Tutsi men, women and children were rounded up and moved to the church. Their screams had alerted the priests and the MILOBs, who had come running. The priests and officers were seized at the church doors and slammed up against the wall with rifle barrels at their throats. They were forced to watch at gunpoint as the gendarmes collected the adults' identity cars and burned them. Then the gendarmes welcomed a large number of civilian militiamen with machetes and handed over the victims to their killers.
Methodically and with much bravado and laughter, the militia moved from bench to bench, hacking with machetes. Some people died immediately, while others with terrible machete wounds begged for their lives or the lives of their children. No one was spared. A pregnant woman was disemboweled and her fetus severed. Women suffered horrible mutilation. Children begged for their lived and received the same treatment as their parents. Genitalia were a favourite target, the victims left to bleed to death. There was no mercy, no hesitation and no compassion. The priests and the MILOBs, guns at their throats, tears in their eyes, and the screams of the dying in their ears, pleaded with the gendarmes for the victims. The gendarmes' reply was to use the rifle barrels to lift the priests' and MILOB's heads so that they could better witness the horror.
[Brent and the others took the two Polish MILOB's but left the priests and wounded behind, as they could not all fit in the one available vehicle. They promised to launch a rescue mission as soon as they returned to headquarters, but since there were so many other rescue missions underway, one could not be launched until the next day.]
Early the next morning, the priests called on the radio and reported that the militia had returned during the night. Our APC had been spotted at the church, and the killers had returned to destroy the evidence of the massacre. They had killed the wounded and removed and burned the bodies.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 1:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alamoudi's Indictment: A Grover Norquist Link?
It may not be hot off the presses, but last Thursday's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" on MSNBC provided an incredible angle to the recent indictment of Abdurahman Alamoudi for alleged terrorist links. The indictment itself was extraordinary considering that Alamoudi had spent roughly a decade helping the Pentagon choose Muslim chaplains to accompany U.S. troops. He had met with President Clinton, was warmly received by George W. Bush the presidential candidate, and made a half-dozen trips to Muslim nations as a goodwill ambassador for the U.S. State Department.
Federal investigators say Alamoudi has led a double life by supporting and/or financing terrorists behind the scenes. Alamoudi's lawyer insists her client is innocent. But perhaps the most amazing story -- should a federal jury convict Alamoudi -- would be what or who kept federal investigators at bay for this long?
John Loftus, an author and former Justice Department prosecutor, is frequent guest on Olbermann's MSNBC program, believes the "who" is arch-conservative activist Grover Norquist. Here are excerpts from Loftus' appearance on last Thursday's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann":OLBERMANN: "How -- what happened here?"
LOFTUS: ".... About a year-and-a-half ago, people in the intelligence community came and said (that) guys like Alamoudi and Sami al-Arian and other terrorists weren’t being touched because they’d been ordered not to investigate the cases, not to prosecute them, because there were being funded by the Saudis and a political decision was being made at the highest levels -- don’t do anything that would embarrass the Saudi government. .... How could these guys operate for more than a decade immune from prosecution? And the answer is coming out in a very strange place. What Alamoudi and al-Arian have in common is a guy named Grover Norquist. He’s the super lobbyist. Newt Gingrich’s guy, the one the NRA calls on .... He is the guy that was hired by Alamoudi to head up the Islamic Institute ....
... Grover Norquist's best friend is Karl Rove, the White House chief of staff, and apparently Norquist was able to fix things. He got extreme right-wing Muslim people to be the gatekeepers in the White House. That's why moderate Americans couldn't speak out after 9/11. Moderate Muslims couldn't get into the White House because Norquist’s friends were blocking their access."
OLBERMANN: "How does this tie back into the thing that apparently pulled the stopper out of the drain, if you will -- the [developments] at Guantanamo Bay? How rotten is the system of the interpreters and the chaplains -- the Muslim chaplains that Alamoudi was involved in setting up?"
LOFTUS: "It's as rotten as it gets. Think of the Muslim chaplains program that he set up as a spy service for al-Qaeda. The damage that's been done is extreme. It wasn't just sending home mom and dad messages from the prisoners. These guys, this network in Guantanamo, stole the CIA's briefing books. Everything that the CIA knew about al-Qaeda is now back in al-Qaeda hands. That's about as bad an intelligence setback as you can get." Loftus added that "[t]here's a lot more to go" in this investigation partly because "Norquist had a lot of other clients." A complete transcript of the MSNBC program is here.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 12:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Blazes
On Saturday night I was enjoying a nice little backyard bonfire in rain-soaked suburban Maryland. We all were reveling in the primal joy of watching a fire, while drinking beer and eating toasted marshmallows. This morning, as I looked at the maps of California on fire and see the pictures, that now all seems a little obscene. I try to refrain from purely personal observations here, but I lived in San Diego for five years and it's hard for me to focus on much else after looking at this:
posted by
Helena Montana at 12:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Revisionist History
The White House has just made it easier to revise its own history.
Read all about it.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 12:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Faux News Sunday
While discussing the Janice Rogers Brown nomination, and judicial nominations in general, with Bill Frist yesterday, Tony Snow made the following statement Now, my question to you is, it is pretty clear that any seasoned minority candidate with good credentials who goes before that committee is going to get raked over the coals and is not going to get confirmed.
Maybe Snow should try to talk to a few of the 29 "seasoned minority candidates with good credentials" who have been confirmed before he says something like this. Or at least do a little research.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 11:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radical Youth?
Hmmm. No more. According to a Harvard University Institute of Politics poll we can all look forward to a much more conservative Republican future in America.
Perhaps surprisingly, 31 percent of college students identify themselves as Republicans, while 27 percent call themselves Democrats and 38 percent independent or unaffiliated. ... The general population is significantly more Democratic - about 36 percent of Americans consider themselves Democrats, 27 percent Republicans, 20 percent independents or third party loyalists, and the rest have no preference, according to the Committee for the Study of the American Electorate.
The changing politics of college students reflects broader societal change. While older generations grew up in a "culture of voting," more than half of today's young voters grew up in households with parents who have never voted, according to David King, a professor of public policy at Harvard University. ... Sixty-one percent of students approve of Bush's performance on the job - higher than the president's overall national approval ratings, which have dipped in recent months and now stand at only 50 percent in a poll released Tuesday by the Pew Research Center. This new data raises more questions than answers. Why is it that college students are suddenly leaning to the middle and/or the right? Why the dramatic shift? How did today's college students become more conservative than general population? Check out the complete findings of the study (PDF) and put on your thinking caps. Theories anyone?
posted by
Zoe Kentucky at 11:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Iron Triangle
Stop wasting our money, dammit!
From the Washington Post Under the contract, Boeing would produce 100 refueling tankers based on its 767-model airliner, a deal Dicks predicts would be expanded and eventually bring the giant weapons manufacturer $100 billion. That would make it one of the most expensive military programs this decade.
Leasing, rather than buying, is the key to the deal: The Air Force, under current budgeting, cannot afford to buy so many aircraft at once. Leasing would permit it to pay less up front, although it would ultimately pay as much as $5.7 billion more overall. And Boeing would be able to keep its 767 production line active despite a decrease in commercial orders for the plane. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and others have denounced the program as corporate welfare born in backroom dealing. Air Force Secretary James G. Roche has said it is a cost-effective way to modernize an aging tanker fleet.
[edit]
Some Pentagon officials remain convinced that the tanker leasing agreement, signed by the Air Force in July, does not meet federal accounting standards, a view shared by the General Accounting Office. Two weeks ago, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said it was actually a purchase disguised as a lease, making it "significantly more costly" than a normal purchase.
[edit]
In December 2001, language authorizing the deal -- but providing no money -- emerged in legislation in what Hill veterans refer to as a "virgin birth," meaning it was inserted into the defense appropriations bill after the bill had passed the House and Senate, during closed negotiations between conferees. It was then approved on the House and Senate floors as part of a compromise bill.
Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), a longtime supporter of expanding federal leasing, has claimed credit for inserting the language. One month before he did so, he received $21,900 in campaign contributions from 31 Boeing executives at a fundraiser in Seattle, where Boeing has many employees.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life In Congo
Rape Gang rape has been so violent, so systematic, so common in eastern Congo during the country's five years of war that thousands of women are suffering from vaginal fistula, leaving them unable to control bodily functions and enduring ostracism and the threat of debilitating lifelong health problems.
And cannibalism Kakule and his two helpers were surrounded by a squad of eight M.L.C. soldiers. At gunpoint, the rebels ordered two of the loggers to hold the third to the ground. Then the squad's commander took off his red beret. He inverted it, put it back on his head with the black side facing outward and yanked a knife across the throat of Kakule's assistant. He cut the tongue from below and pulled it out through the throat; he cut the belly down the middle and claimed the liver; he stripped off the trousers so he could slice off the testicles and penis. One of his squad hacked up the body. The commander gave Kakule his knife, told him to pare the skin from an arm, a leg. He told Kakule and his other assistant to build a fire. From their satchels, the soldiers brought cassava bread. They sat in a circle. The commander placed the dead man's head at the center. He forced the two loggers to sit with them, to eat with them the pieces of boiled limb. The grilled liver, tongue and genitals had already been parceled out among the commander and his troops.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 9:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|