Principles vs Politics

Monday, January 31, 2005

Principles vs Politics

From the Washington Times
Supporters of President Bush's judicial nominees have hired the same media firm used by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth for their efforts to defend the next nominee for any upcoming Supreme Court vacancy.

[edit]

CRC made a splash in the summer promoting the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, the group that questioned the legitimacy of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry's war medals, his claims about his Vietnam War service, and his anti-war stance upon returning to the United States.

The group has been hired into the judicial battle by the Federalist Society, the influential conservative judicial organization from which many of Mr. Bush's nominees have been picked.
From the Federalist Society's FAQ page
Q. Does the Federalist Society take positions on legal or policy issues or engage in other forms of political advocacy?

A. No. The Society is about ideas. We do not lobby for legislation, take policy positions, or sponsor or endorse nominees and candidates for public service. While overall the Society believes in limited government, its members are diverse and often hold conflicting views on a broad range of issues such as tort reform, privacy rights, and criminal justice.
To me, hiring a PR firm sounds like something you would do only if you intended to push for legislation, take a policy position, or perhaps sponsor or endorse a nominee or candidate for public service.

But since the Federalist Society is above that sort of thing, I must be mistaken.

0 comments in Principles vs Politics

Post a Comment

 
Principles vs Politics | Demagogue Copyright © 2010