|
|
|
Demagoguery |
|
|
|
"Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth."
Franklin D. Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, January 02, 2004 |
|
|
|
Lieberman: An Alternative to Dean ... But Not to Bush
It's only a couple of days into the new year, but, already, it's looking as though The Political Underachiever Award for 2004 will deservedly go to Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.).
On the surface at least, Lieberman had ample reasons to feel hopeful when he first launched his presidential campaign. Yet, in spite of his high-name recognition, his status as the 2000 VP nominee and his frequent exposure on "Meet the Press" and similar network shows, polls show that Democratic voters have rejected Lieberman's candidacy.
Now, as key votes in IA and NH loom, Lieberman has embraced a strategy that can best be summed up as "trash Howard Dean." It's no wonder that a Republican pollster recently expressed glee that Lieberman and other Democratic rivals "are beginning to really gouge" Dean. In a recent column in LA Weekly, Harold Meyerson called Lieberman's campaign "the most negative" of all Dems who are running.
Today, the Washington Post noted that Lieberman will continue to pursue this strategy:"[Lieberman] will campaign as the unabashed Dean critic. The Connecticut senator plans to spend much of January bashing Dean on taxes, national security, personal leadership and other issues, his advisers say ... Lieberman's advisers say this message will hit the airwaves for the first time this month. Their goal is to paint the senator as the clearest alternative to Dean." I have no doubt that Lieberman's views present a clear "alternative" to Dean. The real question is whether the Connecticut senator's views present an alternative to George W. Bush. Time and time again, Lieberman has shown himself willing to compromise on the most fundamental social and economic issues that most progressives care about.
Exhibit A: The Tax Cuts President Bush proposed two rounds of deficit-worsening, economically unjustified tax cuts. Lieberman's alternative was to support Tax Cut Lite. The "alternative" was lost on ordinary Americans, and, in the end, Bush essentially got the tax cuts he wanted. GOP senators like Snowe and Voinovich put up a far more vigorous fight against the size of these tax cuts that Lieberman did.
Exhibit B: Faith-Based Proposal Bush proposed a so-called "faith-based" initiative that would allow religious groups to receive tax dollars even as they discriminate against people on the basis of religion, sexual orientation, gender or other characteristics. Lieberman's alternative was Faith-Based Lite. He even joined with ultra-conservative Sen. Rick Santorum to fashion what Lieberman tried to label a "compromise." In effect, Lieberman was co-opted. But, fortunately, civil liberties groups were not. They raised concerns that have (so far) stalled the Bush proposal.
Exhibit C: Iraq War The thrust of Lieberman's argument on Iraq has been simply that Bush had "no exit strategy" for Iraq. But what about the entrance strategy? Even if Lieberman trusted the morsels of intelligence that the administration once shared with the public, doesn't he have anything meaningful to say about how and why we invaded in the first place? Where are the WMDs? Doesn't he think the White House's political manipulation of intelligence may come back to haunt us down the road when we truly need our allies and the UN to support us in an armed attack on a dangerous, rogue nation?
In a separate Post article, reporter Jonathan Finer reminded readers that, in several respects, Lieberman is the Zell Miller of New England:"At Billy's Sports Bar and Grill (in Manchester, N.H.), financial consultant Dick Dryer told [Lieberman] to 'just become a Republican. You're the only Democrat I love.' " No need to explain that.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 3:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
Be Happy, or Else
I was looking for some hopeful and/or whimsical story to put up before leaving the computer behind for 2003. Sadly, all that my usual diversion had to offer were dead comets and presumed-dead Beagles. But the main page for Nature's Science Updates did offer something with a bit of whimsy.Angry men are 70% more likely to develop gum disease than chilled-out ones, a study in the Journal of the American Dental Association suggests. Anger prompts the release of stress hormones, which dampen the immune system and can encourage gum inflammation. I'll take that as a justification to leave work now. I'm doing it for my teeth.
posted by
Helena Montana at 3:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Told You So
Cleveland schools are struggling with the idiocy of their internet filters.Cleveland school officials have gotten several complaints lately about censored words or sites. They plan to create a task force soon to rethink what's naughty and nice.
"This is not a perfect science," says Peter Robertson, the district's chief of informational research. "It's a juggling act."
Most local schools, public or private, use commercial filtering programs, such as SmartFilter or Bess. These frequently updated programs assign Web sites to different categories, and schools pick which categories to ban.
Cleveland's closed categories include Games, Sex, Cults/Occult, Lifestyle and more. Students who click on www.nazi.org get a message saying, "Forbidden. . . . Hate Speech."
And Cleveland goes a rare step further: It stops students from even searching the Internet for the names of sites, banned or not, that use certain touchy words. A search for "gay" or "lesbian" invokes a "Forbidden" message.
posted by
Helena Montana at 3:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Proposals for Dean
One idiotic, the other slightly less so (I'll let you decide which is which.)
From the Corner HOWARD DEAN IN A PACKER HAT? [Tim Graham] I propose that all Democratic presidential contenders (especially Dean, the biggest tax-cut repealer) be banned from wearing insignia worn by professional athletes, since they almost uniformly qualify as the hated "super-rich" that George Bush is pandering to at the expense of everyone else...
Well, I don't think that Dean hates athletes or the super-rich. And I certainly don't see how his opposition to exorbitant tax cuts for the super-rich means that he must hate athletes. In fact, if I had to guess, I'd wager that what Dean actually hates are politicians who pander to the super-rich. That seems to be the most logical explanation.
But at least Dean just put on a hat. If Bush had shown up in Green Bay, Rove would probably have orchestrated some photo-op where he dressed Dubya up in a Packer uniform and then had him run around Lambeau before diving in the end-zone for a "touchdown." And then the conservative pundits could have all cooed over how sexy and athletic he looked while doing so.
Anyway, my proposal for Dean is to stop saying things like this He said it was appropriate in a meat-packing town to bring up bovine spongiform encephalitis - "and I challenge President Bush to pronounce that correctly," he said to laughter from a supportive audience.
Ha, ha, ha, blah, blah, blah. We all know Bush is not the brightest guy but remarks like this make Dean look like a total jerk. It is unbecoming of a front-running presidential candidate and he needs to knock it off.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 12:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
Just the Facts, Ma'am
My gut tells me to look for and publicize the failings in the married lives of the individuals pushing so hard for a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
My heart tells me that if I do, I'll be as bigoted and self-righteous as they are.
My head tells me it wouldn't matter anyway. ... Nationally, the 2000 census found 1.2 million Americans who said they lived with a same-sex partner. That same enumeration discovered 21.5 million divorced Americans and 9.7 million heterosexuals living together out of wedlock. Two weeks ago, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that 'the number of births to unmarried women reached a record high of 1,365,966 in 2002.
The rest of this piece is really worth reading. Although I found it interesting that while the 2000 census figures for same-sex couples are tossed around as evidence that gay people aren't monogamous or are too few to matter, next to 9.7 million heterosexuals living out of wedlock it doesn't seem quite so insignificant, does it? Especially if you consider that the number of gay and lesbian couples is likely to be a low estimate due to the stigma that persists against gays. Which also reminded me of this nice report that proves that gays are in fact, everywhere. Sorry, folks, but there just aren't any "gay free zones" in the U.S. and banning gay marriage won't make it that way.
posted by
Zoe Kentucky at 4:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland Dems Cross the Line
The Democratic leadership that controls both houses of the Maryland Legislature seems to be taking a page from the playbook of GOP leaders in the U.S. Senate. Rather than address the root causes of a filibuster, these Maryland Democrats are trying to change a longstanding rule and, thus, eliminate almost any threat of a filibuster from GOP legislators.
Such a power-grab is manipulative and reprehensible, regardless of the political party that is trying to do it. Democratic leaders in Maryland claim the effort is needed to prevent the GOP from pursuing a partisan strategy to place the state Senate in gridlock. But the fact that Republicans now need the votes of at least two Democrats to engage in a filibuster reveals that the partisanship argument only somewhat applies.
Read more about the Maryland Dems' attempt to reduce the number of votes needed to end a filibuster in this article from Tuesday's Washington Post.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 4:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Showtime + Bitter Right-Wingers = Reagan Dime
The film that CBS pulled but Showtime aired about Ronald Reagan is being used by the GOP's right-wing (is there a GOP left-wing?) to rally support for a bill that would start minting dime coins with Reagan's likeness, instead of the image of former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The dime has borne FDR's profile since 1946, the year after his death. It will be interesting to see if the Reagan-dime bill introduced by Rep. Mark Souder (R-Ind.) is taken seriously.
So far, Souder claims to have 80+ co-sponsors. He has acknowledged that the Showtime-aired movie was "what precipitated me introducing the bill" just recently. Clearly, the motivation for this bill is rooted in bitterness and media-bashing, as evidenced by an article earlier this month in USA Today:Souder rounded up support from colleagues for his bill with a letter, headed "Win One for the Gipper," that lambasted CBS for its "vile miniseries."
... "I believe [Reagan] represents conservative values as we would see them implemented through a president better than anybody else we've had in American history," Souder said. "He, to conservatives, represents kind of the reverse of FDR ... The very fact that Souder identifies Reagan as the "reverse of FDR" betrays the ideological and partisan nature of his effort.
Moreover, is the fact that President Reagan reflected conservative values "better than anybody else" sufficient reason to place his image on our coins or currency? What's so great about being the standard bearer for an ideology that fought or delayed efforts to desegregate schools and public accommodations? Should we honor an ideology that is largely responsible for why Congress has tolerated the fact that tens of millions of Americans live and work without any health insurance?
If honoring ideologues is an acceptable standard, then in the interest of balance would Souder and his allies support minting coins with the likeness of the president who best represents liberal values? Don't bet on it.
Congress has a choice. Discontinue the FDR dime and start producing coins with the image of Reagan -- a man so fundamentally disengaged from the day-to-day operations of government that he could claim to have been unaware that Ollie North and company were essentially running a separate foreign policy out of the White House basement and actually be believed. Or, it can keep a dime that honors a man who served in the White House longer than any other president in our history -- someone who shepherded the nation through the Great Depression and the world's most destructive war.
In normal times, such a bill would be scoffed at as frivolous. But these are not normal times. The GOP has control of the White House and both houses of Congress. We should keep an eye on the Souder bill and, if it starts to pick up momentum, let the message be heard: Leave the dime alone.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 3:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almanacs are the new Tennis Shoe
Just in case you live in a cave and only came out to check this wee little website, here's the security headline of the day: Almanacs May Be Tool For Terrorists, FBI Says. And with that, late night monologues are already written. Around spring, look for the new terrorist trend: local libraries. You won't believe how open they are with information!
posted by
Helena Montana at 9:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monday, December 29, 2003 |
|
|
|
Would You Trust This Man With Your Family?
You might think you can avoid it, but Bob Knight really, really wants to get involved. He had a howler of a quote in this very nice Washington Post story about how gay couples from different nations can find themselves royally screwed when one person's visa runs out.
Naturally, sane Congressmembers have supported the Permanent Partners Immigration Act to grant gay couples the same immigration rights that married heterosexuals have. Mr Knight's quote on the whole issue?"Why would we want to turn America into a magnet for homosexuals?" asked Robert Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute, a conservative group. "These incremental steps eventually result in governmental indifference to families. And that is suicidal in terms of civilization. Hey Bob, delusional much?
Before you think you can explain that one away as an isolated incident, consider this piece of wasted energy. Yep, rather than just feeling the spirit of the season, he wants to lead a campaign against the phrase "Happy Holidays." Whatta Grinch.
posted by
Helena Montana at 5:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fate of the Energy Bill Looms in 2004
The Bush administration has a generally strong record of getting Congress to sign off on its pet projects and initiatives—tax cuts, post-war Iraqi aid, and so forth. But the energy bill that the White House strongly supports stalled when it reached the Senate this autumn and will likely be at the top of the oil companies' wish-list for 2004. One of opponents' major concerns is a provision in the energy bill that protects oil companies against environmental lawsuits related to the gasoline additive MTBE. Let's hope that bipartisan opponents of the energy bill hang tough.
MTBE has contaminated groundwater in numerous communities. The EPA believes this chemical may be carcinogenic. This contamination was not a case in which oil companies added MTBE without the knowledge that they were ignoring or misrepresenting the risks. Indeed, a 2002 article in the Sacramento Bee reported:A California jury has declared MTBE-containing gasoline a "defective product" that oil companies knew would endanger drinking-water supplies while they sold the product as environmentally beneficial.
... Jurors also found that Shell (Oil Co.) and Lyondell Chemical Co. of Houston, the largest domestic manufacturer of MTBE, acted with "malice" in failing to warn consumers that the chemical posed an extraordinary environmental hazard.
... The records showed that oil companies knew of the chemical properties making MTBE problematic in groundwater years before they increased its use in gasoline. Industry studies showed that in some ways MTBE is more worrisome than gasoline's cancer-causing benzene." In August 2002, a court-approved settlement in California led oil companies to pay $28 million for groundwater contamination of Lake Tahoe. The contamination was so severe that it had forced the Lake Tahoe Water District to shut down more than one-third of its 34 drinking-water wells. Contamination problems in Maine prompted that state to ban MTBE as a gasoline additive in 1999.
Even the White House, which has always been quite cozy with oil companies, has supported stripping the MTBE provision from the energy bill, but GOP leaders in the Senate have yet to remove this outrageous provision. Lobbyists for the nation's oil companies are likely to turn up the heat next year as they work to keep the MTBE provision in the energy bill and then fight for the bill's passage.
Oil executives clearly understand what's at stake. A friend from California informs me that the MTBE provision was among the issues discussed by Senator Barbara Boxer at a recent fundraiser that he attended. According to an e-mail from my friend, Boxer pointed out the following:In the Tahoe case, internal transcripts revealed oil executives joking that [MTBE] stood for "Major Threat to Better Earnings" ... Unless the MTBE provision is removed or the energy bill as a whole is defeated, taxpayers—not oil companies—would be saddled with the millions of dollars in costs to clean up groundwater supplies in numerous states. It's shameful that 13 Democratic senators (including Tom Daschle, the Minority Non-Leader) voted to let oil companies off the hook and leave taxpayers to pick up the tab.
posted by
Frederick Maryland at 4:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe They Should Just Hold a Bake Sale
From the You Can't Make This Stuff Up Department:Judges protest as Supreme Court turns into a nightclub
For 121 years the red-robed judges of the Royal Courts of Justice have held out against the intrusions of modern life.
But this Christmas the court's quiet solemnity has been shattered by the sound of late-night discos and thumping rock music as the court has reluctantly opened its doors to corporate entertainment. In the past month, the baroque building on the Strand has become the hottest venue in town, bringing in nearly £100,000 in desperately needed fees.
But for a number of the 150 judges who work in the court, the disruption has been at too high a price. One judge has made an official complaint about the disturbance caused by a late-night party when he was preparing for his next day in court. He was told that he would have to grin and bear it because the evening had raised £7,000.
The Treasury insists that the courts must start generating more money. The financial reality is that although the Royal Courts of Justice is expected to generate fees of £21m next year it will cost £76.5m to run - leaving a shortfall of £55m. Despite judicial protests, the new policy has been a massive success as banks and insurance companies queue up to pay the £7,000 a night for the hire of the Grade I-listed Great Hall. The society magazine Harpers & Queen has named it one of Britain's top 10 party venues.
Its strict "no riff-raff" policy has given it an exclusive status that won a booking from the producers of the Rowan Atkinson film Johnny English for their after-premiere party. Other satisfied customers include the Royal Bank of Scotland, Shell and the US Navy.
But court staff have declined a number of unsuitable bookings including one for a 1920s gangster party where guests would be carrying toy guns.
posted by
Arnold P. California at 3:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunday, December 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
What I Learned On My Christmas Vacation
Thanks to the editorial page in the local paper, I now know that Saddam Hussein apparently had something to do with September 11th. SATISFACTION: I got some satisfaction that Saddam’s daughters were outraged at Saddam’s unkempt appearance when he was caught, but surely not the satisfaction the families of U.S. soldiers and victims of the 9-11 tragedy must have finally felt.
Greg Hanks
Greg, if you know something about the attacks that the rest of us don't, please be sure to alert the proper authorities. If not, please stop calling the local paper and spreading lies.
posted by
Eugene Oregon at 10:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|